Released: Filed Under: Stoa Policy
About "Glass-Steagall (NEG)"
The main thrust of the affirmative case is the goal of economic stability and consumer protection. As the simplified argument goes, without Glass-Steagall, we experienced two devastating financial crises, and this piece of legislation is necessary to make sure that we don’t repeat history. Thus, this negative brief is designed to directly counter this argument. There are several supporting arguments, but your best bet is to make your thesis the exact opposite of the affirmative case. Glass-Steagall wouldn’t have stopped the financial crises in the past. In fact, it makes the economy worse and directly harms consumers. If we are serious about economic stability and consumer protection, we should leave Glass-Steagall repealed.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All Membership content and Library Archives are proprietary intellectual content, so please respect our copyrights. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member or a Library Access Owner you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited, the only exception being from immediate family members within a single household.
Kirstin competed in NCFCA in eight speech categories, as well as both Lincoln-Douglas and Policy debate. She ranked in the top 4 at Nationals in three speech events and advanced to debate finals at five tournaments, three of which she won. Her favorite accomplishment was receiving first place at Nationals her senior year in Impromptu. Kirstin is currently a student at Wheaton College majoring in music and enjoys running her own calligraphy business on the side.